tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post3684592947249770824..comments2023-07-15T05:32:20.508-07:00Comments on Frontiers of Zoology: Repost: Dale Drinnon's CFZ Postings on the Arthur Grant Land Sighting at Loch Ness, And Longnecked Creature Comparisons.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post-14735108789014092802013-06-27T09:12:22.257-07:002013-06-27T09:12:22.257-07:00Don't you read ANYTHING, you ignoramus? The gi...Don't you read ANYTHING, you ignoramus? The given proportions in the report do NOT correspond to the artwork. Mackintosh Bell did NOT create the drawing, his WIFE did. MY purpose was trying to make some sense out of the reported measurements given by Mackintosh Bell and reflect these better I the drawing. I have enumerated the problems and explained the changes in the article WHICH YOU HAVE NOT READ. And for the last time the man's name was Mackintosh BELL, not just "Mackintosh"<br /><br />THAT is enough from you. From now on "kellys4boys" and his flippant, superficial and STUPID comments are barred from this blog. Next time you tell me your real name and take some proper responsibility for your stated opinions and arguments rather than just flinging out pointless comments willy-nilly!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post-48839324480522094942013-06-26T19:40:25.788-07:002013-06-26T19:40:25.788-07:00Thanks for amending the original sketch of the cre...Thanks for amending the original sketch of the creature that Mackintosh saw, Dale; the original sketch has the creature looking more like a giant duck than a longnecked pinniped.kellys4boyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04073673701514824671noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post-19457143102215113682011-06-08T06:12:00.190-07:002011-06-08T06:12:00.190-07:00It is said that GRant's sighting is untrustwor...It is said that GRant's sighting is untrustworthy because "He admitted that he had made it up"<br /><br />Well, yes, he publically disowned the sighting on more than one occasion. He had to. He lost a year of school after announcing the sighting and denying it was the only way he could get on with the rest of his life. Privately he always maintained the sighting was true and privately he even stated that he felt compelled to disown the sighting to his peers. This is all a matter of public record after the fact.<br /><br />Best Wishes, Dale D.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com