tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post4445050973798309628..comments2023-07-15T05:32:20.508-07:00Comments on Frontiers of Zoology: Another Thunderbird Photo?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post-46718649484416121282013-09-26T12:47:12.993-07:002013-09-26T12:47:12.993-07:00I can see it is a building wall and not a hillside...I can see it is a building wall and not a hillside. What if this is the photo that Sanderson showed in Pierre Berton show? Perhaps this was taken from one frame of a recorded video tape where Sanderson is holding his photo. That might explain the blurriness.pteranodonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06655080541192904735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post-47113121110292792512013-04-16T20:43:36.224-07:002013-04-16T20:43:36.224-07:00I think this version is indeed very close to the w...I think this version is indeed very close to the way most people think the photo must have looked. BUT there is no indication that this photo existed at all before 2000 or even before about 2005.It is vague and blurry enough that it could have been chemically drawn on a photograph negative and not to have taken a great deal of artistic skill in the production. We cannot see even distinctly if that is a building or a hillside. nor yet whether or not the darkened area is only a spread cloth or tar paper, or maybe even an excavation in the hillside. In short, unless another cleaer version of this photo should show up, it is much too indistinct to say anything definite about either pro or con. Its just a bad photo.<br /><br />Best Wishes, Dale D.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post-47305940082999900202013-04-15T10:24:59.602-07:002013-04-15T10:24:59.602-07:00I like this one. Close to how i always pictured it...I like this one. Close to how i always pictured it would look.Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03097420555737415471noreply@blogger.com