tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post1639250714194612915..comments2023-07-15T05:32:20.508-07:00Comments on Frontiers of Zoology: Igor Burtsev and The Patterson Film on its AnniversaryUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post-5553554300695205922014-04-10T02:03:08.316-07:002014-04-10T02:03:08.316-07:00There is a problem here and it is the same problem...There is a problem here and it is the same problem as in ANY Cryptid category: these things do not go around with signs on them saying "Im a Sasaquatch" or "Im a bear" on them: witnesses see them and witnesses say they saw a Sasquatch or a bear, or whatever. Not everything witnesses call a Sasquatch is going to be the same thing as you call a Sasquatch, and that has to be taken as given from the start. There is more than one type of thing being described by the witnesses under the same name and that holds for any category you can mention. Ivan Sanderson could discriminate five different creatures being called a "Yeti" all living in the same geographic area, and so on. (The real situation is actually worse than that, the term "Yeti" was a poor choice since it means about the same as "Boogeyman")<br /><br />I m not actually disagreeing with what you say, but I AM saying there is more than one sort of thing being called a Sasquatch by different people.<br /><br />Now, bear with me, there are people-sasquatches and animal-Sasquatches, or animals that also get called Sasquatches and get confused with the people-Sasquatches. Some are apes and some are bears, and those ones are the ones that fit under the heading "Frontiers of Zoology". The PEOPLE-Sasquatches have now been removed from this heading and currently are being discussed under the related heading of "Frontiers of Anthropology"-and notice of this was put up before I went offline without internet access for the last couple of weeks.<br /><br />I have made a point to mention that what I have found in my investigations goes to confirm that all the evidence shows there are people and there are apes, two different things, and you do not really find intermediates.<br /><br />I hope this clarifies the matter for you and that we shall not need to argue on and on about a matter that I count as already resolved and the discussion moved elsewhere.<br /><br />Best Wishes, Dale D.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post-77290166692825307762014-04-09T09:16:19.531-07:002014-04-09T09:16:19.531-07:00Sasquatch have been heard speaking many many times...Sasquatch have been heard speaking many many times. there are audio recordings of them chatting to each other from various investigators. And numerous reports of general public hearing chatter coming from the woods at night. Deep voices they have. Go to youtube and Sasquatch Ontario search. He has gained the trust of a Squatch named Nephatia. a prankster young male. They communicate and have taught him some english over a period of 18 months or more. He says Flower, Mike, Marble, Tree, and brother. These are not apes. these are people. And they have their own ancient language too. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-629061224332673795.post-62107214307603462312012-12-20T13:20:21.669-08:002012-12-20T13:20:21.669-08:00What are your thoughts on that womans claims that ...What are your thoughts on that womans claims that Bigfoot can speak? I personally think she's full of it.Noah Eckenrodehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09710772184932505656noreply@blogger.com