http://malcolmscryptids.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/another-deception-bay-sea-serpent.html
Malcolm's Musings: Cryptozoology
Cryptozoology is the investigation of animals not yet 
recognized by science, but whose existence is hinted at by eye witness accounts, 
photos, or traces. I provided a major review of Australian cryptozoology in my 
1996 book, "Bunyips and Bigfoots". This blog aims to continue reporting on that 
research. However, initially, I intend to provide a service of translating into 
English a number of foreign language accounts from around the world
Tuesday, 28 August 2012 Another Deception Bay Sea Serpent
The best documented Australian "sea serpent" was an elongated, inquisitive mystery animal which frequented Deception Bay in the period 1959/60. Situated at approximately 153° 7' E, 27° 9' S, not far north of Brisbane, Queensland, Deception Bay is a sub-section of Moreton Bay. Roughly semicircular in shape, it is bounded on the south by Scarborough, the northernmost part of the Redcliffe peninsula, and on the north by Bribie Island. I can never hear the name, Deception Bay without thinking, "monster" because the first time I heard about it was in relation to the monster, not long after I moved to the Brisbane area as a boy.
 
In December 1996, I was on talkback radio promoting my book, Bunyips and Bigfoots. When the compere referred to the section on the Deception Bay monster, a Mr Mick Scheirupflug phoned in to say that he also had encountered a strange animal in the bay. One thing lead to another and, that evening, I was able to interview all three witnesses independently by telephone.
Matters of Agreement.
All three agreed on the basic details. Several decades before, Mr Scheirupflug, his son, and young friend had hired a boat in order to fish for whiting in the bay. The creature surfaced not too far away, and was in view for a few minutes, moving parallel to them. It was a slim, serpentine animal consisting of a series of humps, but with no fins. They had difficulty describing its motion but, after some probing, but not leading, questions they all agreed it moved by vertical undulations. They also all agreed that it finally slid forward into the water and disappeared. They did not mention it to anybody else. Now for the individual stories.
First Witness. Mick Scheirupflug, retired carpenter, aged 77 in 1996. He was vague about the year, but suggested it was about 20 years before. Then his wife chimed in and said it was more like 30 or 40. The event took place about half past 8 in the morning, about half a mile from Scarborough, where the water was only about 10 or 20 feet deep, and calm. The boat was stationary, and the animal about 150 yards away. The sighting lasted 4 or 5 minutes. It was pale brown, mottled like a carpet snake. He thought there were three humps, protruding a couple of feet out of the water, with a total length of well over 20 feet. He could not remember seeing any head or tail.
Second Witness: Peter Scheirupflug, son of Mick, aged 49. As the youngest member of the party, his memory was the weakest, and required a lot of prompting. He told me that afterwards, they convinced themselves they hadn't seen it. He thinks he was aged 10 or 11 at the time. The time was about 2 pm, and they were drifting about 2 km from Scarborough, the water being very calm. The sighting lasted 4 or 5 minutes, at a distance of 300 to 350 yards, and "we didn't want to get any closer". He was uncertain about the colour, perhaps greenish grey. There were two humps, as thick as a man's thigh, say 200 mm (8 inches). The head was not much bigger than the body, but he could not see much detail. The length of the head and two humps would have come to 9 or 10 feet.
Third Witness. John Willett, aged 55, Mick's son-in-law. He provided a quite different account of the circumstances. It was at least 35 years before. He said that the sighting occurred in the afternoon, and that they were halfway across the bay, and had decided to head home because the weather had turned rough and windy, with light rain. He contested the statements of the other two, and said he distinctly remembered putting his head down against the wind, and also remembered the sea being choppy. The animal appeared only 20 or 30 feet away. I asked him twice. He was sure it was close because the water was bad. The sighting lasted 1½ to 2 minutes, and they were scared. He mentioned that the animal was moving parallel to them, but in the opposite direction ie north. The motor had probably disturbed it.
He distinctly remembered three humps, and possibly four, and they were quite distinct despite the very rough water. They were at least a foot in diameter, the distance along the tops of each hump being about 5 or 6 feet, and the space between the humps 3 or 4 feet, making a total length of 20 to 30 feet. He couldn't remember the colour. However, he did say the head was like a snake's or eel's and, whereas the other two failed to see any tail, he volunteered, without being asked, that he saw the tail come out of the water just before the animal submerged. It was like a very large paddle, flat and horizontal - unlike a fish's vertical tail - and was not forked. He described its motion as like a snake sliding over three rocks. The body itself did not move up and down i.e. there were no coils, but the humps moved with a fluid motion.
Comments.
After such a lapse of time, the variations in the accounts are not surprising. Indeed, this makes them all the more valuable, by demonstrating that the witnesses' memories have not been altered by telling and retelling the story among themselves. As far as the circumstances of the sighting, I am inclined to put more credence on the third witness. The other two were probably recalling the weather at the start of the excursion. Also, although he has probably underestimated the distance, his estimate of the duration of the sighting is probably more accurate, seeing that the animal did not apparently get too far away. Besides, you can see a lot in 1½ to 2 minutes, if your adrenaline is pumping.
Nevertheless, it is clear that the three descriptions are all variations on a theme. Readers of cryptozoology will no doubt be aware that vertical undulations, with or without a horizontal tail being visible, are only referable to mammals. They will also be aware that elongated, multihumped creatures are well represented among "sea serpent" reports. One is immediately reminded of "Caborosaurus", the sea serpent of the narrow waters around Vancouver Island on the other side of the Pacific. When did it take place? Unless a witness has some circumstance or event to "anchor" a sighting, it is very difficult to remember exactly when a sighting took place. Therefore, I am more inclined to accept the estimate of Peter, who was just a young boy at the time. While the lives of adults tend to be routine, those of children are constantly changing with respect to school and social life. So if Peter said he was 10 or 11, it is unlikely he was as young as7 or 8, or as old as 14 or 15. Taken at face value, this would place the unreported sighting about 1958 or 1959 - just before the much better publicised Deception Bay "monster" of 1959-60. I find that amazing! Not only that, it appears to have been a different kind of animal. The later, better documented one had a larger head and a heavier body. Indeed, one of the witnesses I spoke to emphasized that it was not really serpentine in form, just elongated and thickset. Not only that, but a couple of years later, a totally different kind of "sea serpent" - the classic long-necked, bulbous-bodied type - turned up off the coast of the nearby Bribie Island. Something was drawing these strange denizens of the sea to this very restricted area of water. I hope they decide to come back while I am still around!
Posted by Malcolm Smith at 15:59
2 comments:
alanborky30 August 2012 14:19
Based on what you've written here Malcolm I've just googled 'deception bay australia webcam' in the hope there might be one pointing out towards this highly promising monster hotspot.
Alas motorways aplenty but nothing focused out on the bay itself.
Wouldn't such a cam make an excellent but cheap device for promoting tourism in the area especially if someone saw something?
Replies Malcolm Smith30 August 2012 20:31
It's an idea. However, since the bay is 8 miles wide, and there have been no further reports for the last 50 years, I have my doubts.
In December 1996, I was on talkback radio promoting my book, Bunyips and Bigfoots. When the compere referred to the section on the Deception Bay monster, a Mr Mick Scheirupflug phoned in to say that he also had encountered a strange animal in the bay. One thing lead to another and, that evening, I was able to interview all three witnesses independently by telephone.
Matters of Agreement.
All three agreed on the basic details. Several decades before, Mr Scheirupflug, his son, and young friend had hired a boat in order to fish for whiting in the bay. The creature surfaced not too far away, and was in view for a few minutes, moving parallel to them. It was a slim, serpentine animal consisting of a series of humps, but with no fins. They had difficulty describing its motion but, after some probing, but not leading, questions they all agreed it moved by vertical undulations. They also all agreed that it finally slid forward into the water and disappeared. They did not mention it to anybody else. Now for the individual stories.
First Witness. Mick Scheirupflug, retired carpenter, aged 77 in 1996. He was vague about the year, but suggested it was about 20 years before. Then his wife chimed in and said it was more like 30 or 40. The event took place about half past 8 in the morning, about half a mile from Scarborough, where the water was only about 10 or 20 feet deep, and calm. The boat was stationary, and the animal about 150 yards away. The sighting lasted 4 or 5 minutes. It was pale brown, mottled like a carpet snake. He thought there were three humps, protruding a couple of feet out of the water, with a total length of well over 20 feet. He could not remember seeing any head or tail.
Second Witness: Peter Scheirupflug, son of Mick, aged 49. As the youngest member of the party, his memory was the weakest, and required a lot of prompting. He told me that afterwards, they convinced themselves they hadn't seen it. He thinks he was aged 10 or 11 at the time. The time was about 2 pm, and they were drifting about 2 km from Scarborough, the water being very calm. The sighting lasted 4 or 5 minutes, at a distance of 300 to 350 yards, and "we didn't want to get any closer". He was uncertain about the colour, perhaps greenish grey. There were two humps, as thick as a man's thigh, say 200 mm (8 inches). The head was not much bigger than the body, but he could not see much detail. The length of the head and two humps would have come to 9 or 10 feet.
Third Witness. John Willett, aged 55, Mick's son-in-law. He provided a quite different account of the circumstances. It was at least 35 years before. He said that the sighting occurred in the afternoon, and that they were halfway across the bay, and had decided to head home because the weather had turned rough and windy, with light rain. He contested the statements of the other two, and said he distinctly remembered putting his head down against the wind, and also remembered the sea being choppy. The animal appeared only 20 or 30 feet away. I asked him twice. He was sure it was close because the water was bad. The sighting lasted 1½ to 2 minutes, and they were scared. He mentioned that the animal was moving parallel to them, but in the opposite direction ie north. The motor had probably disturbed it.
He distinctly remembered three humps, and possibly four, and they were quite distinct despite the very rough water. They were at least a foot in diameter, the distance along the tops of each hump being about 5 or 6 feet, and the space between the humps 3 or 4 feet, making a total length of 20 to 30 feet. He couldn't remember the colour. However, he did say the head was like a snake's or eel's and, whereas the other two failed to see any tail, he volunteered, without being asked, that he saw the tail come out of the water just before the animal submerged. It was like a very large paddle, flat and horizontal - unlike a fish's vertical tail - and was not forked. He described its motion as like a snake sliding over three rocks. The body itself did not move up and down i.e. there were no coils, but the humps moved with a fluid motion.
Comments.
After such a lapse of time, the variations in the accounts are not surprising. Indeed, this makes them all the more valuable, by demonstrating that the witnesses' memories have not been altered by telling and retelling the story among themselves. As far as the circumstances of the sighting, I am inclined to put more credence on the third witness. The other two were probably recalling the weather at the start of the excursion. Also, although he has probably underestimated the distance, his estimate of the duration of the sighting is probably more accurate, seeing that the animal did not apparently get too far away. Besides, you can see a lot in 1½ to 2 minutes, if your adrenaline is pumping.
Nevertheless, it is clear that the three descriptions are all variations on a theme. Readers of cryptozoology will no doubt be aware that vertical undulations, with or without a horizontal tail being visible, are only referable to mammals. They will also be aware that elongated, multihumped creatures are well represented among "sea serpent" reports. One is immediately reminded of "Caborosaurus", the sea serpent of the narrow waters around Vancouver Island on the other side of the Pacific. When did it take place? Unless a witness has some circumstance or event to "anchor" a sighting, it is very difficult to remember exactly when a sighting took place. Therefore, I am more inclined to accept the estimate of Peter, who was just a young boy at the time. While the lives of adults tend to be routine, those of children are constantly changing with respect to school and social life. So if Peter said he was 10 or 11, it is unlikely he was as young as7 or 8, or as old as 14 or 15. Taken at face value, this would place the unreported sighting about 1958 or 1959 - just before the much better publicised Deception Bay "monster" of 1959-60. I find that amazing! Not only that, it appears to have been a different kind of animal. The later, better documented one had a larger head and a heavier body. Indeed, one of the witnesses I spoke to emphasized that it was not really serpentine in form, just elongated and thickset. Not only that, but a couple of years later, a totally different kind of "sea serpent" - the classic long-necked, bulbous-bodied type - turned up off the coast of the nearby Bribie Island. Something was drawing these strange denizens of the sea to this very restricted area of water. I hope they decide to come back while I am still around!
Posted by Malcolm Smith at 15:59
2 comments:
alanborky30 August 2012 14:19
Based on what you've written here Malcolm I've just googled 'deception bay australia webcam' in the hope there might be one pointing out towards this highly promising monster hotspot.
Alas motorways aplenty but nothing focused out on the bay itself.
Wouldn't such a cam make an excellent but cheap device for promoting tourism in the area especially if someone saw something?
Replies Malcolm Smith30 August 2012 20:31
It's an idea. However, since the bay is 8 miles wide, and there have been no further reports for the last 50 years, I have my doubts.
-Now as for my commentary: contrary to what Malcom says, the humps are spoken of as humps as humps on the back and not vertical undulations, and a set of two or three humps on the back is common in reports of the Longneck: and Cadborosaurus is a clasical Longneck (read Merhorse+Longneck with "Merhorses" being the males and "Longnecks" being the females) and so it IS valuable to have reports of the same type across the Pacific. Also since Heuvelmans' classic n The Wake of the Sea Serpents ends its collection of reports in 1969, the majority of sources that speak of SeaSerpent reports at all are commonly referring to reports that are more than 50 years old.As a matter of fact there were also other reports more recently as we shall see from the other materials reprinyted below-DD.
An earlier blog posting on Australian Sea-serpents is here:
http://weirdaustralia.com/2012/02/05/sea-serpents-explore-australias-scenic-southern-coastline/
And it was subsequently reprinted on this blog (as the notes at the bottom indicate)
A longer selection by Rex Gilroy follows:
By Rex Gilroy  
 
 
Loch Ness 
Monster
The 
enigmatic Loch Ness Monster of Scotland. For centuries the monster of the Loch 
Ness has frequented the folklore of Scotland but no serious attempts have ever 
been made to study the beast until well into the present century (1900's). 
Nowdays with modern photography, radar and other devices scientists have come to 
accept the fact that there is indeed some mysterious animal lurking in the 
depths of the loch. All that is needed now to verify the creature's existence is 
a skeleton or carcass. From the available photographic evidence and descriptions 
by eyewitnesses many researchers believe the Lock Ness Monster is indeed a 
latter-day form of Plesiosaurus. This contention is further supported by the 
mass of evidence gathered from numerous Irish lochs where the creatures have 
been known for centuries also.
Plesiosaurus Around The 
World
In fact, strange creatures answering to 
the description of the plesiosaur have been reportedly seen throughout the 
world. Plesiosaurus like sea creatures have 
been a sighted off the coasts of mainland Europe, Africa, America, New Zealand 
and also Australia. Yet if indeed the 
Plesiosaurus, how are we to account for its survival since its dinosaurian 
relatives supposedly became extinct 70 million years ago? How could such a creature have survived this long without 
having been captured and identified. My answer 
to these questions is that for one thing, unlike the land surfaces of this 
planet which have been subjected to considerable geological change in Earth's 
long history, the oceanic environment has changed little. 
Therefore there is no physical barrier 
whatsoever to have prevented the survival of Plesiosaurus or any other aquatic 
creatures from the past to present day. As 
scientific dogma teaches that Plesiosaurs and their kin did not survive the 
Cretaceous period then it is only natural that scientists have never bothered to 
even consider the possibility that Plesiosaurs, or latter day variation of them, 
might still exist in the depths of the world ocean, and therefore they have 
never attempted a proper search for the creatures. On the other hand, Dr William Swinton, the world famous paleontologist, 
has admitted there is no reason why there should not be enormous, unknown 
creatures, unknown, or "extinct" creatures inhabiting the sea. He has been 
critical of the Plesiosaur theory.
These beasts he says were oviparous and 
must therefore have come ashore to lay their eggs. Nobody has seen them doing so 
or even found a single egg. He points out that 
plesiosaurs are believed to have been fresh water animals, However, although 
their remains have been discovered in marine strata, mainly in the estuaries of 
the rivers where they lived, there is no reason why they should not have 
undergone in the course of their history a radical change in their physiology. 
In fact many Palaeontologists are of the 
opinion that the Plesiosaurs were indeed adapted to life in the sea.
Mysterious Sea 
Creatures
On April 20th, 1913, Mr Oscar Davies 
and a friend were walking along the beach near Macquarie, a remote town on the 
Tasmanian west coast late one afternoon. Half 
a mile ahead of them they sighted an enormous dark object lying among the sand 
dunes. Believing it to be one of the 
mysterious sea creatures that had been reportedly seen off the coast they began 
making their way towards it. They managed to 
get within forty yards of it when the creature suddenly rose and rushed down 
across the dunes and into the sea.A short way 
off shore it paused, glanced round at the men and then dived out of sight. 
The men were able to describe it later as 
having the now familiar long neck and serpent-like head, large broad body with 
two sets of flippers and along eel-like tail, being blackish in 
appearance.
[This description differs considerably from the version in Heuvelmans, which sounds like a large pinniped of some sort. Some experts have said this was an elephant seal]
South Coast 
Sightings
A similar creature was seen on several 
occasions during 1936 by Mrs... M. McCord from her house overlooking the sea at 
Milton on the far south coast of N.S.W. The 
South Coast of N.S.W has for generations been the scene of a great many "sea 
serpent" reports. Perhaps the strangest occurred back in 1942 when the Lambs 
Point "monster tracks" were discovered by surfers. The scene of the mystery was the beach between Lambs Point and Huskison 
in the vicinity of Jervis Bay. The tracks 
consisted of a trail of big fin-like prints which appeared to have come up from 
out of the sea and in an horseshoe fashion extended up on to the beach before 
turning round and going back into the water. The prints were a good 2 ft in width but the monsterous creature that 
made them was never identified.
Bellambi Reef 
Sightings
During June 1930 four men were fishing 
on the Bellambi Reef 50 miles south of Sydney when they spotted what appeared to 
be a very long animal which they thought was a sea serpent. Overcoming their 
fear they rowed nearer to have a better look at the creature. The head they all agreed looked like a serpent. Several 
days after this event a "sea serpent" was reported seen at Scarborough a few 
miles away; perhaps it was the same animal. Many witnesses saw it undulating lazily in the direction of the Bellambi 
rocks. It was at least 80 ft in length and swam with its head in the air at the 
end of a long snake's neck. What appeared to be a bulky body and long tail was 
detected below the surface.
Hawksbury 
River {Central Coast} 
Some very unusual things have been 
happening lately around the central coast and Hawksbury River district north of 
Sydney. Throughout 1975-76 there have been several reports of sightings of 
"longnecks" thereabouts. During May 1976 a 
husband and wife of Woy Woy decided to go fishing in their rowboat in nearby 
Brisbane Waters. They had rowed out 200 yards 
from the shore and begun fishing. Suddenly their craft was caught up in some 
unusual disturbance. It was then that the wife noticed a large greyish creature 
swimming alongside of their boat and about 3 ft below them. In the clear water she detected what she later described as 
a 30 ft long animal with the familiar long neck, broad body with flippers and 
along eel-like tail. The "thing" had swum 
rapidly past their boat when a few yards distant it raised its snake like head 
above the water to a height of 3 ft and continued heading towards the open sea. 
It was then that the would-be fishermen began rowing hastily for 
shore.
Hawksbury 
River Sightings
Within a couple of weeks other people 
began reporting having seen the same beast near Ettalong. One woman who lives 
near the headwaters of the Hawksbury River watched for fifteen minutes with 
binoculars late one afternoon as an enormous dark shape moved inland up the 
river. As it passed offshore the creature 
raised its head at least 4 ft out of the water. It was then that the woman also 
detected part of its back breaking the surface. She said later, immediately reminded of the creatures similarity to 
photographs she had seen of the elusive Lock Ness Monster. Could these and many more sightings thereabouts have 
anything to do with the large fin and slide marks that have turned up on the 
banks of the Hawksbury River near Wisemans Ferry and the disappearance of whole 
boating parties that have gone out on the river never to return?
Deception Bay 
{Queensland}
There have been many similar happenings 
around Deception Bay out of Redcliffe, Queensland. Early in 1960 a fisherman, Mr Ron Spencer, said he had seen this same 
creature five times and that it had surfaced near his boat and his companion 
with "strange staring eyes". He said that its 
head was 3 ft long and 2 ft wide and that it had a long neck and large 
body.
A much smaller creature was seen later 
in the same region by a Mr Nigel Tutt of Hendra. The beast swam within 8 ft of 
his boat. He described it as being of mottled 
brown colour with a squarish head the size of a full cornsack, a body 3 ft 
across and 20 ft in length. The beast appeared to have nostrils, a yellowish 
mouth and flippers 6 ft back from the head.
There was a rash of sightings of a 
large Plesiosaurus-like sea creature around Deception Bay and Redcliffe during 
the period 1969-70. On one occasion a party 
took a fishing boat outside the bay. Suddenly they were surprised by a 
long-necked "thing" which appeared from out of the water nearby their craft. 
The creature turned its head to look in their 
direction and then submerged. The event terrified the group so much that ever 
since they have kept clear of fishing out of the bay.
Cairns 
Sightings
Further northand outside Cairns in far 
north Queensland fishing boats and other craft have been seeing strange sea 
creatures for the past 50 years. it was here during 1975 that a young skin diver 
working in 20 ft of water searching relics of old shipwrecks observed large 
bubbles of air 3 ft in width rising from beyond a nearby cliff. Upon investigating he saw that the bubbles were rising from 
an enormous long-necked dark shape further below him and which he estimated to 
be 35-40 ft in length. Wasting no time he returned to his boat and left the 
area.
Conventional 
Science
Clearly we are still a long way from 
finding the answers to the perplexing problem of these enigmatic creatures. 
Although sightings of mysterious monsters of 
the deep have plagues the records of maritime history, conventional science has 
always remained skeptical. Too often when 
sightings of unusual creatures have been reported to the authorities they have 
been lightly brushed aside as either being known species such as seals or 
whales, or else the imagination of ship's crews. These explanations do not however always stand up to serious argument. it 
is evident that the scientists still have much to learn about the creatures 
inhabiting the worlds oceans, for it is obvious from the growing mass of 
evidence that creatures thought long extinct may still inhabit the murky 
depths.
Psychic Australian 
March 1977
![]()  | 
| Deception_Bay_Serpent_by_Pristichampsus Based on info from Malcolm's book "Bunyips and Bigfoots" This seems a fair composite of an elephant seal going by reports, ca 20 feet long  | 
![]()  | 
| Type 1A_Long-Necked_by_Pristichampsus The common "Plesiosaurus" Type of Sea-serpent seen aound Australia and worldwide.  | 


DON'T LOOK OVER THIS COMMENT! Sorry but I had to make sure. Anyway, how do you suscribe here?
ReplyDeleteP.s. Do you know of any sightings of pliosaur-like creatures?
Best Wishes,
Noah Eckenrode,
Amateur Cryptozoologist
Around Australia? Yes, a few, and they include one report of a "Young one netted" about the turn of the century. Tim Morris might not have made illustrations of the type, though.
ReplyDeleteYou have the option to "Follow" this site and to receive updates by email. Basically all you have to do is push some buttons in the upper right hand corner of the page. Having your accounts associated with a regular email account would help us both out.